Eclipses and Native Revivals

On August 21, 2017, I took this photograph in eastern Oregon – Cayuse, Umatilla, Walla Walla, and Northern Paiute lands. It was about ninety seconds before totality. It’s a 180-degree panorama, looking south, with the east on the left edge and the darkening west on the right.

Seven years ago, I stood atop a sagebrush bluff in eastern Oregon, waiting for the coming total eclipse of the sun. As we gathered and talked and laughed, the air cooled and the yellow landscape faded into muted tones. Ten minutes before totality, in a half-light like some strange Instagram filter, a Brewer’s Sparrow started singing. Three minutes to go, Venus appeared almost directly overhead. The sky in the west sank into a deep velvety midnight blue, as if blackness was pouring down from the heavens. Distant smoke from a fire on the southern horizon lit up like a sunset. Two minutes to go. Darkness spread from the west, threatening to envelope us. The crowd began to exclaim, “It’s coming!” and “Oh my God!”  And, then, suddenly, we looked up, and there it was– floating in cool peaceful stillness, a perfect black disc surrounded by a silky silver corona. In its serene beauty, it seemed to be looking at us. Benevolently.  It felt much closer to me than the sun normally feels, perhaps just a few thousand feet up. It was real; everything else was surreal.

On April 8, a much larger solar eclipse – over four minutes of totality, and with the moon fully five percent larger than the sun – will sweep from Mazatlán to Quebec.

Dramatic portents of the future, total solar eclipses have played a significant role in Native history, featuring prominently in political movements and spiritual revivals. Here are two of the most recent examples.

June 16, 1806 

Sitting in his plantation-style mansion along the Wabash River, Governor William Henry Harrison was working hard to get title to Native land, to open it up to land speculators, such as his father-in-law, John Cleves Symmes. But he was hearing rumors of revolution from the White River country. Tecumseh’s brother, the one they called the Prophet, was calling for the Shawnee and others to renounce the ways of the white man and return to their traditions.

Harrison challenged him: “Who is this pretended prophet who dares speak in the name of the Great Creator? If he is really a prophet, ask of him to cause the sun to stand still.”

Two months later, at 10:41am on June 16, from the White River to Detroit, from the Mississippi River to Boston, the sky went dark, the air cooled, crickets chirped and robins sang. Stars came out and, for four and a half minutes, the sun turned into a black hole framed by an ethereal silver radiance, as if the Creator was looking right at you.

Tecumseh’s trans-tribal campaign to push back the American and British armies was later assisted by two more natural phenomenon. In the fall of 1811, as he traveled thru Chickasaw, Choctaw, Cherokee, and Muscogee (Creek) lands to build a Native alliance from the Great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico, a light appeared in the sky – a great comet with a long tail. It grew brighter each night, easily visible to the naked eye. It was Haley’s Comet. And everyone new that “Tecumseh” meant “shooting star.”

That winter, with the comet still visible, the massive New Madrid earthquakes, up to 8.2 on the Richter Scale, shook the entire region, temporarily reversing the flow of the Mississippi River. Another sign.

January 1, 1899 

Paiute Ghost Dance, 1890

Around 2pm, in northern Nevada, as land and sky turned dark, stars appeared, and the pearly corona exploded around a perfect black hole in the heavens, Wovoka of the Northern Paiute saw more than all this. He saw a new earth, filled with the resurrection of the dead, living in peace as in times of old, in a land teeming with deer and buffalo.

His vision spread throughout the West, from reservation to reservation. Tribes sent emissaries. The vision grew. There will be no hunger, disease, or death; no tears, pain, or mourning. The whites will sink into the soil. All will be made new. This will come to pass if the people perform the Ghost Dance.

What happened next is well-known: Sitting Bull was assassinated and the 7th Cavalry took revenge on hundreds of women and children at Wounded Knee, for the crime of dancing.

April 8, 2024

And yet, now, Wovoka’s vision is taking root, even without the coming eclipse.

The Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Council Fire still burns today, and the Six Nations still cross the border that crossed them at Niagara Falls. The birch bark scrolls are back in Anishinaabe (Ojibwe (Chippewa), Odawa, and Potawatomie) hands. The land of Oneida County once again feels the stomp of Oneida feet. Ho-Chunk lands feel the stomp of elk hooves. The Cherokee woods may be in a new place, but the stomp dances never stopped. Lenape (Delaware) hear their own drums in Manhattan. The Shawnee now tell the story of the Great Serpent Mound.

Wounded Knee had to be bought from a white couple at an inflated price, but now that land is back with the Lakota. The bars in Whiteclay have closed. The Arapaho boys have been repatriated from Carlisle to Wind River, the nine Sicangu to Rosebud. The Kiowa are re-acquiring the lands promised to them at Medicine Lodge. The Sacred Pole is back with the Omaha. The National Bison Range is now managed by the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. The buffalo herd at Osage Nation Ranch is growing.

The Salish Sea is caressed by the paddles of pullers, on their way to protocol. The Elwha River runs free again, and the Klallam are catching coho. The Colville Confederated Tribes are restoring wolves, lynx, and bighorn sheep from the Cascades to the Rockies. The Snoqualmie are re-recognized and the mist of the falls that bears their name still carries their prayers to the heavens. The Cahuilla oversee the restoration of desert bighorn sheep. And condors soar across Yurok skies.

On April 8, when the Creator looks through that great hole in the sky, they will see all this. Indeed, they see it now.

A young condor prepares to take off. It is likely to fly across all of Yurok lands and more.
Posted in news | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

My book project – Native American history, 1491 to the present

montage of Pueblo Revolt, Trail of Tears, and Standing Rock water protector

Osiyo, relatives! Many of the articles I’ve published and the blog posts I’ve shared in the past few years come from a rather massive book project: a collection of stories, spanning 1491 to the present, coast to coast, hundreds of tribes – and, obviously, from a Native perspective.

The stories, some familiar, others long-forgotten, range from the killing of Ponce de León to the kidnapping of Pocahontas, the Pueblo Revolt to the leasing of Manhattan, Wounded Knee (both of them) to Standing Rock. Together, these stories form an arc from independence to resistance to loss to resilience and, finally, to renaissance.

Many ask for a Native history book that is accessible to the public and from a Native perspective. This is that book.

All profits will go to tribal charities and needs.

Native memorial at Greasy Grass

Status Update

I began this project in 2010. As of 2024, I have a complete draft manuscript (which I’m always tweaking, revising, and updating, of course). There is no book deal yet, but there are multiple agents interested in representing me.

I’m seeking some extra help from the Native community as reviewers of draft sections. See below…

Taos Pueblo

Beta Readers

You can be a part of it! I’m looking for tribal sensitivity readers – reviewers – to read the sections that apply to their tribes, reviewing for accuracy, terminology, spelling, etc. I will pay you. I’m happy to hear feedback from young people and students as well as elders. I’m especially looking for people familiar with the histories of these peoples: Anishinaabe, Apache, Cheyenne, Comanche, Haudenosaunee, Lenape, Muscogee, Navajo, Nez Perce, Pueblo, Shawnee, Sioux – Lakota, and Wampanoag. Wado, relatives. Stoodis! I hope to hear from you! Contact me via my personal website.

Trail of Tears map at Cherokee National History Museum
Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Stories from Gaza, Indian Territory: Two narratives of American bullets

As the Revolutionary War ramped up, British and Mohawk fighters killed 30 settlers in Cherry Valley, New York. George Washington responded by sending four thousand troops into Haudenosaunee land. This was called the Sullivan-Clinton Expedition.

He called for “the total destruction and devastation of their settlements and the capture of as many prisoners of every age and sex as possible. It will be essential to ruin their crops now in the ground and prevent their planting more.”

They burned 40 towns.

“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says the Gaza war has come at a ‘very heavy price’ for his side. The military says more than a dozen soldiers have been killed in the territory since Friday, bringing the total of the ground assault to 154…. More than 20,000 people have been killed – mostly women and children, and 54,000 injured in Gaza since 7 October, the ministry says.”  – BBC, 24 Dec, 2023

~~~

“Around 80 unidentified Palestinian bodies have been buried in a mass grave in Rafah, southern Gaza.” – BBC, 26 Dec 2023 

Mass grave (mostly women and children) at Wounded Knee, 1890

~~~

Israel’s prime minister says the war on Hamas in Gaza will continue for “many more months.” He was pushing back Saturday against persistent international cease-fire calls following mounting civilian deaths, hunger and mass displacement in the besieged enclave. – AP, 30 Dec 2023 

“The long painful journey to the west ended March 26th, 1839, with four-thousand silent graves reaching from the foothills of the Smoky Mountains to what is known as Indian territory in the West.”  – Private John Burnett, first-hand description of the Trail of Tears.

~~~

“Israel Knows the Number of Calories Needed for Gazans’ Survival. How Few Is a War Crime? Gazans are collecting weeds to prepare meals and mothers cannot breastfeed because they are so weak. At food-distribution stations, hundreds of small children stand in long lines amid horrible crowding, holding pots, cups…” – Haaretz, 29 Dec 2023

“After several years at Fort Sumner, life became very hard for the Navajos. There was no wood for fires; there weren’t enough seeds to grow their crops, which would hardly grow in the poor ground, anyway; and insects ate what did come up.

If a rat was killed, the meat, with the bones and intestines, would be chopped into pieces, and twelve persons would share the meat, bones and intestines of one rat.

Some boys would wander off to where the mules and horses were corralled. There they would poke around in the manure to take undigested corn out of it. Then they would roast the corn in hot ashes to be eaten.” – Howard Gorman, Sr., Navajo Stories of the Long Walk Period

Many massacres of hundreds of Native women and children – Wounded Knee, Big Hole, Whitestone Hill – are called “battles” by the US government and military to this day. The term “massacre” is typically reserved for instances when only white settlers were killed, and usually fewer than ten.

~~~

In 1847, five Cayuse men killed 13 white settlers near Walla Walla, Washington. This is known as the Whitman Massacre. Calling for troops, President Polk waved a lock of Narcissa Whitman’s hair on the floor of the House of Representatives. Two years later, the US had taken over all of modern-day Oregon and Washington in retribution.

~~~

“A draft document prepared by the Israeli intel ministry suggests an option to initially relocate Gaza’s population to tent cities in northern Sinai.” – Haaretz, 30 Oct 2023

“our settlements will gradually circumscribe and approach the Indians, and they will in time either incorporate with us as citizens of the United States, or remove beyond the Missisipi.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1803

“An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.” – US Indian Removal Act of 1830

~~~

“Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has called for Palestinian residents of Gaza to leave the besieged enclave, making way for the Israelis who could ‘make the desert bloom.’” – Aljazeera, 31 Dec 2023

“the Natives have not fulfilled the first commandment, to subdue the earth and have dominion over it. Therefore, In a vacant soyle, hee that taketh possession of it, and bestoweth culture and husbandry upon it, his Right it is.” – Rev John Cotton, 1628

~~~

Native lands and reservations, 2023
Posted in news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Standing Rock and the DAPL EIS: My public comment letter

As I described in my last post, we have now finally arrived at the public comment period regarding the DAPL pipeline. This was supposed to be done before the pipeline was built. The water protectors brought us to this moment. Now we can all play a role.

Here is the comment I am emailing to NWO-DAPL-EIS@usace.army.mil.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

September 30, 2023

Attn: Brent Cossette
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CENWO-ODT-N
1616 Capitol Avenue
Omaha, NE 68102

Dear Mr. Cossette,

I encourage you to review the DAPL Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) as if it was 2014, before a route was selected. This is when, according to judicial rulings, the EIS should have been prepared.

It is no surprise that judges ruled that an EIS is required. This project – a massive oil pipeline crossing many states and major rivers – meets many criteria for an EIS, far exceeding those required for a much smaller Environmental Assessment (EA).

In this context, I recommend Alternative 2: cancelling the pipeline but allowing it to stay in place. Ideally, the right thing to do is Alternative 1, removing the pipeline and restoring the land. However, such an effort would require considerable earth moving and could lead to additional disturbance of sacred sites. Additionally, an empty pipeline could prove useful in the future as a place to sequester carbon. Ultimately, the decision between Alternatives 1 and 2 should be done in consultation with the affected tribes.

I make this recommendation for the following reasons:

  1. If considered in 2014, a full analysis of the original northern route and the current route would have considered Native sites and natural resources at risk, and likely rejected the current route. They rejected the northern route and came to the current route by avoiding tribal consultation and an EIS.
  2. The current pipeline was finished in 2017 after a race to complete the pipeline before a judge could rule on it. Allowing this practice – akin to highspeed chase to the county line – is a threat to the rule of law and should be punished by refusing to give precedent to an illegal action.
  3. The construction of the current pipeline violated Executive Orders 12898 (Environmental Justice) and 13175 (Tribal Consultation), as well as Section 106 regarding tribal resources.
  4. The pipeline continues to pose an unacceptable risk to downstream communities, such as those at Standing Rock Sioux Reservation. I defer to many other comments about this.
  5. Current production in the Bakken formation is falling and will soon be less than it was before the pipeline was created.
  6. In a world where we must reduce our carbon emissions quickly, new infrastructure for oil production and consumption should no longer be approved.

Sincerely,

Stephen Carr Hampton

Former Deputy Administrator, California Office of Spill Prevention and Response (retired)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Posted in Standing Rock | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Standing Rock and DAPL in 2023:  The EIS process and the public’s second chance

Here’s a summary of the DAPL legal situation and where we are today.

Quick summary: 1) The pipeline is running and has been since 2017. 2) It has still not been officially approved under the law – and it could be shut down. And right now is the official public comment period.

The Past

Recall the evening of December 4, 2016, when the Standing Rock water protectors celebrated with fireworks. Why? The Army Corps announced they would not allow the pipeline to go under Lake Oahe. In official legal terms, they announced they would not grant an easement for the pipeline to go under the lake without a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). That’s a big study that takes many years, expert review, and two public comment periods. It’s the legal battleground on which environmental battles are fought. I explained it in this post: Standing Rock: Understanding the EIS process.

fireworks above tipis at Standing Rock in celebration on Dec 4, 2016

Back in January 2017, six weeks after the fireworks and two days before Trump took office, the Obama Administration officially started the EIS process by issuing a Notice of Intent to start the EIS. That’s Step 1 of four steps.

Then, four days after taking office, Trump issued an Executive Order putting a stop to the EIS – actually, ordering the Army Corps to grant the easement to complete the pipeline.

That set off a race in early 2017 between environmental lawyers and DAPL construction workers. They got the pipeline up and running on June 1, 2017.

Two weeks later, on June 14, 2017, a judge ruled, nope, that easement is not sufficient without a full EIS. But… the pipeline can stay up and running in the meantime.

Pretty much all the Trump years were taken up with appeals and various rulings, the result being much the same: the pipeline needs an EIS, but it can stay operating in the meantime.

DAPL EIS process annotated with interruption caused by Trump

The Present

So that brings us to today, six years on. We’ve moved to Step 2 and the Army Corps, who is the federal agency overseeing this project, has released the Draft EIS. The Army Corps webpage for the DAPL project is here. The EIS itself is a huge report – with many appendices – about the potential impacts of the pipeline. It can be found at this website.

Draft EIS’s always list a few “alternatives.” Typically, after public comment, they will release a Final EIS that selects one of the alternatives.

Taken from Section 2.0 of the Draft EIS (page 2-2), here are the alternatives:

Alternative 1: Cancel the pipeline and order federal lands to be restored to pre-pipeline conditions, including removing the pipeline.

Alternative 2: Cancel the pipeline but allow it to stay in place.

Alternative 3: Allow DAPL to keep operating as is. 

Alternative 4: Allow DAPL to keep operating but with “additional conditions.”

Alternative 5: Force DAPL to relocate to the “North Bismarck Alternative” – the route DAPL secretly rejected before relocating it Standing Rock.

Usually, when putting out a Draft EIS, they list a “preferred alternative,” which is often the one they end up choosing. Significantly, in this case they have not selected a preferred alternative. This is unusual and no doubt a decision made at the highest level, probably by President Biden himself. This preserves the Army Corps – and the Biden Administration’s – ability to evaluate the political winds and make a decision at the last minute, and after considering public comments.

DAPL pipeline route maps
The original route is the upper dashed line. But the people of Bismarck complained so they moved DAPL to to the rez.

Alternative 5 is delightfully snarky, pointing out how white privilege forced the company to pivot to tribal lands without even a public meeting. But I suspect the Biden Administration is leaning toward Alternative 4, though it is clear that Alternatives 1 or 2 are possible, given the lack of a preferred alternative. The governor of North Dakota has already pointed this out.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe has been openly critical of the Army Corp’s consultation process and other aspects of the Draft EIS. You can read their open letter here. Though this comes from a few months ago, I believe most or all of these concerns remain. You can check out Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s webpage about DAPL here.

A lot has changed since DAPL started. Oil production in North Dakota has fallen 300,000 barrels per day (bpd). Because DAPL is currently moving about 600,000 bpd, with continued declines, it wouldn’t even be missed.

Even before the pandemic, parts of the North Dakota oil industry were moving toward alternative energy. In 2019, even before the pandemic, the Dickinson Oil Refinery stopped taking Bakken oil and was retrofitted to take corn and soybean oil to make renewable diesel for the California market. This petro-free fuel, molecularly identical to conventional diesel, is taking over the market in many places. I write about it here. Point being: the world has changed in the last few years. The world is pivoting away from fossil fuels, even in North Dakota.

How to Comment

Public comments can focus on any concerns regarding any of the alternatives, or simply voice a preference for an alternative.

Instructions are at the Army Corps website and here:

Comments on the DAPL Draft Environmental Impact Statement can be mailed to:

Attn: Brent Cossette
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
CENWO-ODT-N
1616 Capitol Avenue
Omaha, NE 68102

Comments can also be emailed to NWO-DAPL-EIS@usace.army.mil.

Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement must be received no later than November 13, 2023.

For all of my previous posts about Standing Rock and DAPL, go here.

These people got us to this point. The battle continues today.
Posted in Standing Rock | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“White history” on the northern Plains: How the word is not passed

The ghost tipi frames at Big Hole.
Memorial tipis at Big Hole, where Nez Perce families were attacked by the US Army while they slept.

Full disclosure – I am working on a book. It covers Native history and how it is told today.

We can put books about Native history into four categories:

1) older books written by white historians, where Natives are “Indians” portrayed as wild or noble savages (e.g. most books before the 2000s);

2) older books that are actual Native accounts, either first-hand or second-hand, based on interviews in the early 1900s (e.g. Black Elk Speaks, Plenty Coups, Yellow Wolf);

3) more recent books written by white historians, where Natives are more nuanced, more sympathetic, and less stereotyped (e.g. Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee, 1491, Killers of the Flower Moon, and anything by Pekka Hämäläinen); and

4) more recent books written by Natives about Native history (e.g. books by Vine Deloria Jr., Walter Echo-Hawk, and, more recently, The Heartbeat of Wounded Knee by David Treuer and Project 562 by Matika Wilbur, though these are mostly about the present).

Perusing the book offerings at the Fort Phil Kearny visitor center museum gift shop, I saw the usual assortment. I struck up a conversation with the guy working there. He was white, though claimed to have a Lakota name which was bestowed upon him after he badgered an elder at Pine Ridge for a year and a half. Eye-roll. Whatever, Kenny Boy. To his credit, he seemed to have read most of the books in the store. I laid out the four book types described above, and told him it was my impression that the last category – Native history written by Natives – seemed to be about one per cent of the total, or less. “That’s about right,” he said. In fact, I didn’t see any “category 4” books there.

My intent is to add to that last category.

Books for sale at Big Hole
Some of the books for sale at the visitor center at Big Hole.

While my project is not just about the Indian Wars of the 1800s – there are hundreds, if not thousands, of such books – it will encompass them. To that end, I was in Montana and Wyoming to visit some historic sites – sacred sites, both marked and unmarked. As I traveled, I listened to Clint Smith read his book, How the Word is Passed. In a parallel effort to mine, he, a Black writer, visited several historic sites having to do with slavery, the Confederacy, and how those memories are told today.

Bitterroot Valley: Silence of the lands

If you’re not into these books, not a history buff, but just a passing motorist or a person living in the area, the world looks different. National monuments, historic sites, state parks, city parks, roadside historical markers, and even the names of towns, hotels, gas stations, and restaurants communicate the past. Not just communicate, they honor it. And that which they don’t communicate they do not honor; they are effectively erased from the public consciousness.

South of Big Hole

I began by following the flight of the Nez Perce from Lolo to Big Hole National Battlefield in western Montana. I expected to see a lot of signage along the lines of “Chief Joseph Trail” or “The Trail of the Nez Perce.” After all, when they fled their beloved Wallowa Valley in 1877, eight-hundred men, women, and children (three-quarters of them in those last two categories), the US media followed the story live – or as live as possible at the time. The people of New York and Philadelphia found themselves cheering on the bravery and resourcefulness of this community on the run, being pursued by several companies of the US Army. When they passed through the Bitterroot Valley, the white settlers boarded up their stores and grabbed their guns. But the Nez Perce passed peacefully, even stopping at their stores to purchase supplies for the road.

But now, in 2023, their story is difficult to find in the Bitterroot Valley. Instead, all the historical focus is on a different journey, when Lewis and Clark, coming from the other direction, traveled much of the same path in 1804. The highway was labeled the “Lewis and Clark Trail,” with a special icon of two intrepid men in silhouette. Quickie marts and grocery stores paid homage to them. Official historical markers were invariably about Lewis and Clark or other pioneer history.

Bitterroot Valley, where the historical marker is missing

Signs for Lewis and Clark outnumbered the Nez Perce saga about a hundred to one. Actually, a hundred to zero. There was one historical marker I pulled over to check out, but the actual marker was gone. There was nothing but a gorgeous green valley behind the post holes, backed by snowcapped purple mountains and a barn with a huge American flag on it. I marked the lat-long on my phone and later looked it up online. Yep, that was the only one that had mentioned the Nez Perce.

Big Hole historical sign about friendly people

One sign in the Bitterroot Valley provided a list of Salish words for various locations, adding that “these ancient names testify to the sustainable tribal presence in this landscape reaching back thousands of years.” The same sign notes they are now gone, that “the tribe is now based at the Flathead Indian Reservation north of Missoula.” Near Big Hole, another sign proclaimed it the “Land of 10,000 haystacks… noted for abundant hay, fine cattle and horses, great hunting and fishing, beautiful scenery, and friendly people.”  Nowhere was there any mention of how the valley went from the world of tribes to the world of friendly people. On that transition there was total silence, as if the Indigenous people had simply vanished in the wind, to be replaced by Pa Wilder building his little house on an empty prairie. All we can deduce is that, somehow, the Flatheads were replaced by friendly people with lots of cattle. This is what Clint Smith calls “white history.”

Big Hole: A small exception

At Big Hole National Battlefield, I was immersed in a more complete story. From the visitor center, I looked out over a lush high plain bordered by a sinuous willow-lined creek. In the displays in front of me, the Park Service and Nez Perce had collaborated on every word. In the distance, just to the right of the willows, a ghost village of tipi frames stood, a haunting memorial to the men, women, and children who were targeted while they slept – like a mass shooting, like the My Lai Massacre in Vietnam. The soldiers – some survivors from Custer’s Last Stand a year earlier, some volunteer militia (the “friendly people”) from the Bitterroot Valley who had just seen the peaceful Nez Perce families a few days earlier – were told to “aim low” as they trained their rifles on the tipis.

Big Hole National Battlefield

I walked out to the ghost tipis, grateful to be allowed on sacred ground. The sky was turning dark purple, threatening rain, but the grass was verdant, the camas were just starting to bloom, and the smell of fresh wet sage and the rattling call of sandhill cranes filled my senses. A small pamphlet was available as a walking guide to describe what happened there on the morning of August 9, 1877. It was graphic, sparing few details. Walking among the empty tipi frames was like visiting Auschwitz or a similar memorial.

Big Hole is not along a main highway. Tourists have to go out of their way to stop there. Apparently, few do. I was the only one there. In the neighboring towns, there is no mention of it. The ranger in the visitor center, a well-meaning white guy, said the Nez Perce descendants still come from Colville every year to remember.

Sacagawea: A good Indian

Sacagawea is mentioned in many of the Lewis and Clark memorials, though her story and her role is rarely detailed. She is what American white history has deemed a good Indian who, mostly unwittingly, furthered the project of ethnic cleansing, aka “manifest destiny.” There are more statues to Sacagawea than there are for any other woman in the US. Most gloss over her life. Like Pocahontas, she was kidnapped as a youth. Like Squanto, she successfully manipulated European colonizers into returning her to her homeland. Her lure was a win-win: guns for the Shoshone; horses and safe passage for Lewis and Clark.

Roadside marker about Lewis and Clark
The past was largely told through the lens of Lewis and Clark.

The area of the joyous rendezvous with Cameahwait, her brother, in the valley between Dillon and Clark Canyon Reservoir, is unmarked. Yet, had this not happened, the Lewis and Clark Expedition may have ended there. They had already nearly reached the continental divide, the western edge of the Louisiana Purchase. To go further, they would be trespassing and land claimed by Britain, not to mention Nez Perce, Cayuse, Palouse, Umatilla, Yakama, etc.

At the lake, there are several markers, as well as a campground named after her brother Cameahwait. The Sacagawea Memorial, installed by the Montana Daughters of the American Revolution, says only that she provided “invaluable services.”

The valley where Sacagawea united with her brother
The area where Sacagawea reunited with her brother, Cameahwait.

I was interested in how this resourceful, sex-trafficked, missing Indigenous girl found her way home, how she remembered the route she had last seen five years earlier, when she was twelve. As the expedition approached from the north, crossing an enormous broad valley, I saw they would have entered a short canyon between two cliffs. Ahead, on her right, she would have a seen a distinctive needle-like spire. Beyond that, the valley opens up again, sagebrush with willows lining the meandering Beaverhead River. And after that, a right turn at the next large meadow (now under the reservoir) and up over the pass to home. This she remembered. Based on Clark’s diary, she remembered details as far back as the Yellowstone River. As close as I could get to where I imagined this reunion occurred, I collected some sage, wet from a fresh rain, to celebrate the memory.

Greasy Grass/Little Bighorn/Custer’s Last Stand: Summer grasses

One of the most iconic sites in Native American history, it goes by three names and means different things to different people. Most Natives call it the Battle of the Greasy Grass, the Indigenous name for the river. The US government officially calls it the Battle of Little Bighorn, another reference to the river. It is a national monument, a higher honor than Big Hole, which is merely a national battlefield. Most people probably know it as Custer’s Last Stand. It lives as a distant reminder, like a passing shadow in the collective unconscious, that the land was not conceded without a fight. Yet, probably few people could tell you the historical context, the run-up to it, or what happened afterward. Most can barely mention the tribes involved.

The battle itself stands out as anomalous in many ways. Yes, it was a deliberate attack by the US Army on an encampment that was predominantly women and children. That was nearly always the case, from the Pequot Massacre in 1637 to Big Hole in 1877 to Wounded Knee in 1890. Exceptionally, in this case, the attackers became the victims. It is difficult to think of another time that happened. Only the Battle of Mabila in 1540 or St. Clair’s Defeat in 1791 (which nearly wiped out the entire US Army at the time) compare.

Display at Little Bighorn
Changes glued to the displays suggest revisions made after tribal consultation. Yet, a lot more could have been revised.

The larger story around Greasy Grass is typical, and the massacre of Custer and his men did not change the final outcome. After trespassing minors (led by Custer) discovered gold in the Black Hills, the US contrived a war to take the land already agreed to be the Great Sioux Reservation by the Treaty of 1868. President Grant used the term “to open the land.” Custer’s Last Stand was one of several major battles in this war. Within two years of the massacre, the Lakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho were subject to worse massacres, surrendered, and were rounded up and put in concentration camps that we still know today: Pine Ridge, Rosebud, Standing Rock, etc. In 1980, the Supreme Court ruled, yep, the war was illegally contrived and the tribes deserve compensation. But, rather than giving the Black Hills back, or any #landback, the Court awarded money. To this day, the tribes have refused to touch it. It sits in a special fund held by the Department of the Interior where it has grown to over a billion dollars. But, in one of the most principled stands of resistance anywhere in the world, the cash-strapped people of these reservations maintain that “the Black Hills are not for sale.”

None of this story is told to visitors at the national monument. Even the illegally concocted war is obfuscated so as not to offend white sensibilities, to avoid diminishing the sacrifices of the US servicemen. White history is easy to write, because the focus is about what not to write.

Little Bighorn

The vibe at the national monument is a lot like Arlington National Cemetery. As I park my car, I see rows and rows of white tombstones on the grass in front of me. More white tombstones are scattered around the hillsides, marking where each US soldier fell. A few mark where Natives fell, though not many fell here. Other signs describe the intensity of archeological investigation to understand what happened and who many have fallen where. All the focus is on honoring their bravery and sacrifice.

Standing on a hillside among the tombstones, I was immediately reminded of the famous Japanese haiku about imperialism:

Ah! Summer grasses!
All that remains
Of the soldiers’ dreams

Valley of the Greasy Grass
The meadow where many of the tipis once stood at Greasy Grass, looking up toward the hill where Custer met his end.

I was disappointed that there is no access to the valley bottom, the running stream among the cottonwoods, where eight-thousand were camped, where, on a hot June morning in 1876, children played, older boys watched over the horse herd, the women gathered wild turnips, and the men slept in until someone yelled, “The chargers! The chargers are coming!” Walking among the cottonwoods down there would allow visitors to imagine the perspective of the Indigenous people, but that’s not the point of this monument.

ceremony bush at Greasy Grass
A bush festooned with prayers and memories after a Lakota or Cheyenne ceremony. In the background are the cottonwoods along the Greasy Grass, where hundreds of tipis stood.

It is not a place to point out that these were soldiers attacking mostly women and children. It is not a place to ask why Sand Creek, Wounded Knee, the Dull Knife “battlefield,” or countless other sites where Natives were massacred, have little to no memorial. None have the status or funding of Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument. Most actually have a barbed wire fence that says “no trespassing.” They are on privately-owned ranches, inaccessible to the public. Some of these ranches fly Confederate flags with AR-15’s emblazoned across them. Others allow limited visitation and coordinate with tribal descendants for ceremonies of remembrance. “We work with the tribes,” a friendly landowner at another site told me. “We’ve been here five generations.” I started doing math in my head.

The empty land

Leaving the Greasy Grass, I passed signs for Miles City and Sheridan. Further along various highways were towns named Custer and even Chivington, and counties named after Grant, Crook, and Sherman. Between the various Indian reservations, the Plains are a who’s who of Indian killers, making a modern map resemble a giant battlefield.

Wyoming scenery

As I headed south toward the Powder River country, site of many battles, the land seemed empty. I felt as if I was a boat on a green sea. The Rocky Mountains do not gradually diminish and sink into the Great Plains. Rather, the plains rise up like a great green tidal surge, the lines of hills like swells in the ocean. At the western edge, the Bighorn Mountains emerge like a cresting wave approaching the shore, topped with whitecaps of snow. No towns, no people, no houses, a few cattle. The only buffalo I saw was on the Wyoming state flag. The land was ethnically cleansed, but for what? It appeared empty to me.

How the Word is Passed by Clint Smith

I suppose most of that land is privately-owned ranches, with leases for coal and natural gas. I saw some of the landowners, in cowboy hats, perched on barstools sipping coffee, watching Fox News to anesthetize themselves from the realities of climate change and the facts of history. Some of them, I suppose, were friendly people.

The erasure of the Nez Perce in the Bitterroot Valley, the glossing over of the contrived war against the Sioux and Cheyenne – with its connections to the Black Hills, the Homestake Gold Mine, and reservations such as Pine Ridge and Standing Rock – and the drastic differences in the memorialization of the lives lost at Little Bighorn as compared to those lost at Sand Creek or Wounded Knee, are not surprising to Natives; we are used to it. It parallels what Clint Smith found with respect to Black history. He describes a national commitment to “the country’s collective ahistoricism” to support white supremacy, the notion that this land is primarily for white people.

And yet, despite this repression of memory, the Indigenous people still remain, almost an underground society, but rising up like flowers on the Plains, supportive communities of compassion, committed to preserving the earth.

Purple rain in Wyoming
Despite all the dysfunction in remembering its history, the land is astoundingly beautiful.
Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Indigenous Critique: The Dawn of Decolonizing our Minds

Rather than emanating from the brains of highly-evolved European men, it was actually Native American ideas regarding equality, personal liberty, and leadership accountability that fueled Europe’s Age of Enlightenment, ultimately leading to the American and French Revolutions, as well as modern concepts of human rights and equality.

These are the basic concepts presented in the opening chapters of The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity by David Graeber and David Wengrow. They go on.

Reversing Manifest Destiny painting by Charles Hillard
Charles Hilliard’s painting for the Indian Land Tenure Foundation redefines progress and “Western Civilization.”

In the 1600s and 1700s, Europe had no democracies. What they had was massive income inequality coupled with massive oppression of the poor by the rich. People were born into status; it was a caste system. Across the pond, the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy had a thriving republic, and women had powerful political rights across much of Native America. No one was born into status. Because leadership had to be earned, it was a land of great orators who maintained positions of leadership by giving away food and gifts to those in need.

Native American ideals shocked European colonizers, from Jesuit priests to the kings’ men, and made their way back to Europe in the stories they told. There, these radical notions of individual freedoms became a sensation – and ultimately, they revolutionized Europe and colonial America (literally).

Conservative forces, such as noblemen and kings, countered, attacking the source. The Indians in America only embrace these notions, they said, because they are simple savages, at an early stage of human development, uncivilized. Those talking points, in turn, became the mantra of the colonizers and the basic historical big picture we all grew up with.

The Dawn of Everything book

I’ve read a lot of history books – European-centered, Indigenous, original source material, etc. – yet nothing prepared me this mind-blowing concept. The myth of Western Civilization, that every progressive idea came from Europe, that indigenous cultures around the world are quaint windows into a primitive past, is shattered.

Some of the professional reviews on Amazon are eye-popping. One compares it not with Charles Mann’s 1491 or Harari’s Sapiens, but with the works of Galileo and Darwin. A history professor at UCLA writes, “Graeber and Wengrow have effectively overturned everything I ever thought about the history of the world…. The most profound and exciting book I’ve read in thirty years.”

Regarding what they call the Indigenous Critique, I’d seen the trees, just not the forest. I’m familiar with many of the stories, and even some of the exact quotes, they use to build their case.

The Benjamin Franklin quote I saw coming as they built up to it. This is one of Dawn’s first examples that Native societies were making an impression on the Europeans.

“When an Indian Child has been brought up among us, taught our language and habituated to our Customs, yet if he goes to see his relations and make one Indian Ramble with them, there is no perswading him ever to return, and that this is not natural merely as Indians, but as men, is plain from this, that when white persons of either sex have been taken prisoners young by the Indians, and lived a while among them, tho’ ransomed by their Friends, and treated with all imaginable tenderness to prevail with them to stay among the English, yet in a Short time they become disgusted with our manner of life, and the care and pains that are necessary to support it, and take the first good Opportunity of escaping again into the Woods, from whence there is no reclaiming them.”  – Benjamin Franklin, 1753

I can think of another example not in Dawn.

“Thousands of Europeans are Indians, and we have no examples of even one of those Aborigines having from choice become Europeans!” – Hector de Crevecoeur, 1782

As early as 1744, Onondaga leader Canasatego offered political advice to the American colonists. A group of arrows, he said, cannot be easily broken. The Continental Congress remembered and acknowledged Canasatego’s words in 1775. His image lives on in the Great Seal of the United States.

Dawn uses the famous Huron orator, Kondiaronk, as their primary example of the Indigenous Critique, criticizing everything from European manners and parenting methods and calling them out for their deception and religious hypocrisy. Because of money, Kondiaronk argues, they do little except out of greed. Those familiar with Native history can probably think of many examples of this critique, coming from Tecumseh, Red Cloud, Chief Joseph, and others.  

One example that Dawn does not use (though, to be honest, I haven’t finished the tome yet) is this 1765 gem from Attakullakulla regarding women’s equality. In most tribes, especially in the East, women had special political powers, especially the right to depose male leaders if they acted recklessly or in bad faith. Thus, women needed to approve all treaties. When the Cherokee showed up to negotiate with the English, and saw only English men there, Attakullakulla was dubious they were sincere. His first question: “Where are your women?” Even Puritan women, who lived in near-servitude, were aware of the rights and authority of Indigenous women.

Dawn then goes on to describe how accounts of these stories went viral in Europe, so much so that the Jesuit Relations, a 64-volume set of missionary diaries from North America, were blamed for contributing to civil unrest and the French Revolution.

The American colonists were equally inspired to apply Native concepts of individual freedom in their fight for independence from the King of England. Many of them dressed as Indians during the Boston Tea Party to make a statement – that they, like the Natives, can reject authorities they don’t like. (I’m not sure if Dawn includes this example either.)

But once the American colonists gained that independence, they quickly adopted the conservative counter-argument – that the Natives believed all that stuff about freedom and equality and respect because they were simple savages. Essentially, when the Declaration of Independence states “all men are created equal,” it’s adopting an Indigenous concept. Yet, it goes on to mention “merciless Indian savages.” By the 1800s, any credit to the Natives is long forgotten. Here is Thomas Jefferson in 1824:

“Let a philosophic observer commence a journey from the savages of the Rocky Mountains, eastwardly towards our seacoast. These he would observe in the earliest stage of association living under no law but that of nature, subsisting and covering themselves with the flesh and skins of wild beasts. He would next find those on our frontiers in the pastoral state, raising domestic animals to supply the defects of hunting. Then succeed our own semi-barbarous citizens, the pioneers of the advance of civilization, and so in his progress he would meet the gradual shades of improving man until he would reach his, as yet, most improved state in our seaport towns. This, in fact, is equivalent to a survey, in time, of the progress of man from the infancy of creation to the present day.” – Thomas Jefferson, 1824

I haven’t encountered this yet in Dawn either, but I’m pretty sure it’s coming.

American Progress, the Manifest Destiny Painting
The original panting, American Progress, is often referred to as the Manifest Destiny painting. It is based on the counter-narrative that cast Native Americans as backward — after borrowing their ideas.

If you don’t want to read the entire 700-page book, and have trouble just obtaining the first few chapters about the Indigenous Critique, one can find shorter versions in some essays and reviews on line:

In 2020 (actually before Dawn was published), Bridget Orr, an English professor at Vanderbilt, picked up the baton in a paper that added examples of French and English plays from the 1730s that also used Native American foils to challenge oppressive European culture, especially with respect to women. Later, Irish playwrights used similar examples, from the “black legend” of Spanish conquest in Latin America, to challenge English oppression of Ireland.

Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

Magical realism in Tennessee

Yesterday the Tennessee legislature put three of their own on trial,

   one white woman and two black men – the so-called #TennesseeThree.

They did not really consider them their own.

The three had been concerned about children killed by guns – too concerned,

   for they had shamed the white masters in the Big House.

The two Black men were expelled.

The one white woman had to watch.

That’s how they do a legislative lynching.

~~~

Last week the Tennessee Valley Authority announced they had the bones of 4,871 Cherokees

 – and Choctaw and Shawnee and Chickasaw and Osage.

Pursuant to a law passed thirty-three years ago, they would return the bones

    to the rightful tribes and families.

My ancestors come from the Cherokee Overhill Towns of Chota and Tanasi,

   which now sit under the waters of Tellico Reservoir.

As a child I wrote a report about a little fish, the snail darter, Percina tanasi.

Like the Cherokee, the Supreme Court ruled the fish had a right to live along the river.

But the president and the congress found a way around it.

Like the Cherokee, the little fish does not live there anymore.

I read the Tennessee Valley Authority’s public notice

    and I realize I qualify to apply for the bones.

~~~

I just learned that one the major sources of the great white myth

   of the Cherokee princess great grandmother that so many claim to have

   comes from the presumed existence of Princess Cornblossom.

Just over the border, the commonwealth of Kentucky

   has installed a roadside memorial to her.

But she did not really exist,

   except in the movies.

Her monument is there just to say,

Hey, we honor the bravery

   of those we ethnically cleansed.

Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The 2020 US Census: Where did all the new Native Americans come from?

Comparing the 2020 census to the 2010 census, the Native American population nearly doubled. Where did all these new Natives come from?

The 2020 US Census reported dramatic increases, relative to 2010, in all non-white populations. This was overwhelmingly driven by people choosing mixed race options to identify themselves. While the total US population grew 7.4%, those who claimed multiple races (e.g. some combination of white, Black, Native American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or other) nearly tripled, increasing 2.76 times, or 276%.

For example, those who stated they were Black-only increased a mere 5.6% (less than the overall population growth). When combined with other races, however, the total Black and mixed-Black population nearly doubled, increasing 89%.

The Hispanic population (also called Latino) is treated as an “ethnicity” and not a “race” by the census, and thus includes all potential races (e.g. white Hispanic, Black Hispanic, Native Hispanic, etc.). This group increased 23%. In absolute numbers, they represented slightly more than half of the total increase in the US population.

White-only was the only category that saw a decline, of 8.6%.

Native Americans by category, 2020 census

Curiously, the increase in numbers for Native Americans exceeded all others. The total Native population nearly doubled, growing from 5.2 million to 9.7 million. This corresponds to an increase from 1.7% to 2.9% of the US population.

Forty percent of the Native growth came from Hispanic Natives. Fifty-two percent of the growth came from people identifying as non-Hispanic mixed-Native/white. The remaining 8% came from increases in other mixed race/Native categories.

The non-Hispanic Native-only category (the red piece of the pie) stayed almost unchanged, growing by less than a few thousand people. This was probably because these people, many living on reservations, were undercounted due to Covid during the 2020 Census.

I’ll focus first on the 40% of the growth associated with the Hispanic-Native component, which includes both Hispanic Native-only and Hispanic mixed-Native (the olive pieces of the pie). Together, these grew from being 23% to 31% of the total Native population. This is attributed to an increase in Hispanic consciousness regarding Indigenous ancestry. The Hispanic mixed-Native category was the primary driver, nearly tripling, increasing from about a half million to 1.5 million people.

The majority of Native population growth, however, came from a near-tripling of people identifying as non-Hispanic mixed-Native/white (the orange pieces of the pie). In absolute terms, this population grew from 1.2 million to 3.5 million. In 2010, there were more non-Hispanic Native-only respondents (red) than mixed-Native (orange). In 2020, not only were they reversed, but the number stating they were mixed-Native was twice that of Native-only.

Comparison of 2010 and 2020 census results for Native Americans

Some of this has been attributed to mixed Native/white relationships. In trying to understand that, I ran some numbers. The total increase in this section was 2.3 million people. If this was from mixed relationships, that would mean the increase was due to them having children. Just how many children could they have in ten years?

Using an average Native population of 7.4 million during the period, using standard estimates that 20% of the population are women of child-bearing age (15 to 44), and they average 51 births per 1,000 women per year, they would produce 740,000 children over the ten years between 2010 and 2020. That assumes that every child of a Native mother had a mixed-Native or white father. However, we need to double this if we simultaneously hypothesize that every child of a Native father also had a mixed Native or white mother. Thus, if every Native person of child-bearing age had a child with a mixed or white partner, they would possibly create 1.5 million mixed-Native/white children. That leaves just 800,000 people claiming mixed-Native/white status unaccounted for. Let’s assume my extreme assumptions are a little less extreme and imagine one million unexplained new Natives, all mixed-Native/white. Where did they come from? It would seem they existed during the 2010 census but did not check the Native box then, but they did in 2020.

The answer may be the same as with Hispanics – an increase in their consciousness regarding Native ancestry. There is, of course, one big difference. While most Hispanics are likely mestizo, whites, inherently, are not.

So where did this increased consciousness of Native ancestry come from? Perhaps the internet. In recent years there has been a proliferation of genealogical websites that purport to show online “proof” of relationships to ancestors such as Princess Cornblossom, Queen Cleopatra, or even Quanah Parker or Pocahontas. Ancestry.com, MyHeritage.com, FamilySearch.org, Geni.com, and Findagrave.com make no efforts to proof their crowdsourced data. I cover this issue in a previous blogpost. Fictitious entries are repeated from one family tree and one website to the next. In fact, they use algorithms to hype faux genealogies. I once received an email from FamilySearch proclaiming, “Stephen, you’re related to Pocahontas!”

Did one million white people also check the Native box on the 2020 census? Maybe. There are some other factors to consider.  The census reports that improved question design led to fewer non-responses among non-white respondents. That is, more people checked boxes (correctly) indicating their diverse backgrounds. That is, these people were there all along, they just weren’t counted correctly in the past. These improvements in question design, however, seem focused on developing additional categories (e.g. Middle East/North African instead of just “Other Race.”) The opportunity to chose multiple races on the census began in 2000. This doesn’t seem like it would have impacted Native American responses.

In determining tribal citizenship, of course, tribes don’t care who Ancestry.com says your family is, nor which box you checked on the census. They require documentation to meet whatever the requirements are for their tribe. It would be interesting to compare census results with how many people are actually enrolled citizens of federally-recognized tribes (acknowledging the many caveats regarding why many Natives may be excluded from such a tally). However, even though each tribe probably knows exactly how many citizens it has, a total number does not seem to exist. The closest I could find online was an estimate by the Bureau of Indian Affairs that there were about 2.0 million enrolled citizens in federally-recognized tribes in 2010. This corresponds to 5.2 million Natives according to the 2010 census (2.9 million Native-only and 2.3 million mixed Native). Given that the census numbers in the Native-only category are widely believed to be an undercount, it seems the BIA estimate is extremely low, and thus not helpful.

Regardless of an increase in “Pretendians” who may have gone so far as to check the Native box on the census, Native America is changing, with a dramatic increase in mixed Natives, both Hispanic and non-Hispanic. Mixed relationships are common across Indian Country. This creates complications for tribes still clinging to blood quantum to define citizenship. Such requirements will increasingly exclude even those who are raised within their communities, separating parents from children. The already hazy landscape of Indigenous identity is getting very smoky.

UPDATE: I’m going to add some of the great observations from relatives at IndianCountry and other subReddits. The increase in mixed-Native/white is also potentially due to:

1) A surge in people doing DNA tests, finding out they are 1% Native, and checking the box on the census, even though they have no idea which tribe.
2) A big push by tribes to get qualified people enrolled and to fill out the census form, as it affects federal funds to tribes.
3) An increase in people actually checking Native on the census because, in the past, older generations would either avoid the census or lie on it (leaving Native blank) out of fear that social services would take their children. It’s sobering to see how many people mentioned this.

Posted in news | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

I’m not related to Pocahontas and neither are you

Probably.

Pocahontas supposedly sparing John Smith.
Pocahontas supposedly sparing John Smith. She would have been eleven years old at the time. In most paintings, her skin is white.

Right up there next to the my-grandma-says-I’m-descended-from-a-Cherokee-princess thing is an almost-as-farfetched American white people myth: that you’re related to Pocahontas. It’s difficult to go a month in online forums about Native ancestry without someone claiming it.

So it came as no surprise when I received an email from FamilySearch.org saying – well, here, I’ll just show you a screenshot from my email:

the email I got from FamilySearch saying "you're related to Pocahontas"

Let’s be clear, Pocahontas lived a very long time ago. She was born around 1596 and died in 1617 at the age of 21. This was even before the Pilgrims landed at Plymouth Rock. She was kidnapped by the English of the Jamestown colony at age 17, impregnated, married to one of her captors, converted to Christianity, and taken to London, where she died of an illness. For more, see my blog post, America, meet the real Pocahontas.

According to Pamunkey oral history, when she was kidnapped, Pocahontas was already married to a man named Kocoum and may have already had a baby boy. Further knowledge of that lineage, however, is not documented.

With her captor, John Rolfe, Pocahontas had a child named Thomas Rolfe. Thomas married a British colonist and they had one daughter, Jane Rolfe. Jane married Colonel Robert Bolling, another colonist. They had one child, John Bolling. John was a Virginian “planter”; that’s a euphemism for slave plantation owner. He had six children, all born between 1700 and 1718, who gave him thirty-seven grandchildren. If anyone can document relation to Pocahontas, it is most likely through this route.

On the Cherokee side of my family, my ancestors included several mixed white-Cherokee relationships. The white ones actually do go back to the Jamestown settlement. That said, I’m not aware of any family connection to Bolling, Rolfe, or Pocahontas. When I got the email from FamilySearch, I thought, well, maybe they found something.

But no, they went the long way around. I’d already seen something like this before. I’m a direct descendent of Nancy Ward, Beloved Woman of the Cherokee (1738-1822). From her, FamilySearch once magically wove a connection directly from the Cherokees to Chief Powhatan, Pocahontas’s father, somehow bypassing the Catawba, Muskogee, Shawnee, and any number of other tribes in between. That seemed far-fetched, as I’ve never heard of trade or commerce or even war between the Cherokee and Pamunkey. The latter, by the way, has always been a fairly small tribe, thus further decreasing the odds of a connection. That faux-genealogy has since disappeared from their website.

This time, FamilySearch went an even longer way around. They avoided my Cherokee ancestors and went through my Choctaw great-grandfather (Edwin Erastus Carr) and then up through the white side of his family until they got to a Susannah Anderson (1648-1724). FamilySearch then claimed that Susannah was the Native daughter of Weroansqua Cockacoeske, the “Queen of the Pamunkey” in the late 1600s. They then show how Cockacoeske and Pocahontas were cousins.

WikiTree, which is more rigorously monitored, has this to say about Susannah.

“There is no evidence she was a Native American. Some believe that Susannah is the daughter or granddaughter of Cockacoeske and her husband, Chief Totopotomoi. While Susannah did marry Cornelius Dabney, Cockockoske’s interpreter, there is no evidence that Susannah was anything other than European origin.”

Faux genealogies

So just what is FamilySearch.org? They are the genealogy website of the Mormon Church, driven by crowdsourced information, obviously with limited oversite. You know, so they can baptize all the people who ever lived. Ancestry.com, MyHeritage.com, and Findagrave.com are even more ludicrous and ambitious in their faux genealogies.  

A lot of them utilize so-called “Princess Cleopatra”. In fact, such a person did exist, though both the title and name may have been provided by English colonists. In reality, there is no documentation of her children.

Ancestry.com page for Cleopatra
From Ancestry.com: This lineage shows descendants of Cleopatra, a supposed half-sister of Pocahontas, complete with Native stereotyped names. One wonders who dreamed up these supposed names. Some may come from old fictional novels.
Findagrave.com purports that this is the daughter of Pocahontas and Kacoum. She supposedly married a Thomas Pettus. Many of the accounts include “photos” of illustrations of other Indigenous people. This could be an artist’s rendition of Pocahontas or possibly Sacagawea.
MyHeritage page for Cleopatra
This entry, combining Powhatan, Cherokee, and Shawnee names, is all the more remarkable because the world’s first photographic portraits were not made until 1839.

This one, posted at a website entitled “Mermaidcamp”, purports to show a genealogy again jumping from the Pamunkey to the Cherokee. Not even FamilySearch traces any descendants of Cleopatra. WikiTree asserts there is no documentation that this Fivekiller ever existed.

The Native American Project

Fictional genealogies involving Pocahontas – and probably other historical Indigenous figures – are so prevalent that WikiTree established the Native American Project to clean it up. They note, “There are quite a few fictional, fraudulent, or mythical people who have been included as Native American or married to a Native American.” Their goals are to “have information from reliable sources; include documentation for facts; strive for historical accuracy; avoid stereotyping; present material in a non-biased, culturally-sensitive manner; separate fact from fiction.” Thank you WikiTree.

WikiTree has this to say about Cleopatra:

“Cleopatra” was probably born about 1599-1602 in Tsenacommacah, the home of paramount chief Powhatan, in what is now southeastern Virginia. Based on a 1641 petition from Thomas Rolfe to the General Court (the governing body) in Virginia (from a later copy made before 1691, original now lost) seeking permission to visit his mother’s sister, Cleopatra, this would make her daughter of either Wahunsenacawh Powhatan or one of his many wives.

No one knows what her actual name was, Cleopatra is either a name given to her by the English or the copyist’s attempt to read the original handwriting and getting it wrong. Helen Rountree [a respected historian] and others suggest she may have been the same woman as Mattachanna, a known aunt of Pocahontas who may have accompanied her to London.

There is no documented marriage, no documented name of a husband. There are no documented children. There is no documentation that would indicate who either of her parents was. Her date and place of death are unknown.”

Ancestry.com, FamilySearch.org, MyHeritage.com, and Findagrave.com should learn from WikiTree and clean up their pages.

The deeper questions

There are deeper questions here. What’s with the national obsession with Pocahontas? Why do people want to be related to her?

She was somewhat forgotten by white society until the 1800s, during the time of Manifest Destiny and ethnic cleansing. Then she was resurrected and appropriated, described as “snatched from the fangs of a barbarous idolatry”, “foremost in the train of those wandering children of the forest”, to quote the artist of her mural in the Capitol Rotunda. She was portrayed as the model good Indian, even though her life story most resembled that of a Nigerian high school girl captured by the radical Islamist group Boko Haram.

Like an Indian mascot, connecting to the Disney version of Pocahontas allows colonizers to revise history, to say we are all connected, to say all is resolved. To establish that connection through a fictitious Cherokee lineage allows people to avoid the reality of the Rolfes and the Bollings, who cast shadows of kidnapping, rape, and slavery over the story.

Truth is, we cannot choose our parents, nor anyone we are descended from. And we shouldn’t try to.

Painting of Pocahontas baptism from the Capitol Rotunda
The life size mural in the Capitol Rotunda, showing the kidnapped Pocahontas confessing the faith of her captors.

Update since I posted this:

It turns out this is just the tip of the iceberg. These faux genealogies encompass other realms, connecting Americans to European royalty and, especially, the signers of the Magna Carta. On the Native side, these fake names have led to state-sanctioned roadside monuments (“Princess Cornblossom”) and even entire tribes of questionable origin, arguing it out online against a dedicated group of Natives at WikiTree requiring documentation for outlandish claims. In the already-muddy world of Native identity, this whole crowdsourced family history thing is mucking things up further. More on all this in the future.

The FamilySearch email I got
Unless you’re related to the Bollings, you shouldn’t get an email like this.
Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments