The Right Wing attack on ICWA and Tribal Sovereignty

In Season 2 of her podcast, This Land, Rebecca Nagle does some serious investigative journalism, uncovering a small network of powerful ultra-conservative power-brokers, foundations, law firms, attorneys, and judges working together to tear down the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). Their ultimate goal, however, is not just to take Native children from their tribes and families– it is to tear down the legal framework of Native sovereignty altogether, to open Native lands for oil development, pipelines, and any other corporate enterprise. They want to use a tool of genocide, the removal of children, to destroy Native governing authority.

I highly recommend listening to all eight episodes of Season 2 of This Land. (Season 1, about the history of the Cherokee Nation, the Trail of Tears, and the McGirt decision is also excellent.)

To guide your listening – and to help me follow the story – I’ve created this diagram. You can also see the actual text of the podcast at the link above by clicking on the individual episode pages.

CLICK DIAGRAM TO ENLARGE

Diagram of the financial and legal backstory to Brakeen v Haaland

Nagle paints a sordid picture: cringe-worthy evangelical church members seeking to adopt “beautiful” Native children; adoption agencies minimizing ICWA; lawyers openly ignoring ICWA; judges in league with a conservative agenda also openly against ICWA; an illegal indigenous baby pipeline between Arizona and New Hampshire; powerful lawyers working pro bono to take down ICWA; right wing think tanks trying to take down all Native sovereignty; biased and prejudiced judges with little knowledge of Native sovereignty under the US Constitution; and, coming soon, a Supreme Court with many of the same biases and lack of knowledge. In the face of this tsunami of naivete and prejudice, harnessed by those with ill intent, tribal governing authority now seems to hang by a thread. It feels very much like the 1800s.

UPDATE (November 2022): Brakeen v Haaland has been heard by SCOTUS. Here is my essay about how that went, focusing on a certain naïve question by Justice Alito.

UPDATE (April 2023): As predicted, the Brakeen case is not just about children; it’s about money. A new case seeks to shut down Indian gaming using the same race-based arguments.

Unknown's avatar

About Stephen Carr Hampton

Stephen Carr Hampton is an enrolled citizen of Cherokee Nation, an avid birder since age 7, and a former resource economist for the California Department of Fish & Game, where he worked as a tribal liaison and conducted natural resource damage assessments and oversaw environmental restoration projects after oil spills. He writes most often about Native history and contemporary issues, birds, and climate change.
This entry was posted in news and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Right Wing attack on ICWA and Tribal Sovereignty

  1. A thorough article about how some states are creating their own versions of ICWA: https://imprintnews.org/foster-care/states-enact-icwa-type-laws/64018

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.