Twelve Things More Offensive than the Washington Redsk*ns

Much has been written about the problems associated with team mascot names like the Redsk*ns—their derogatory history, their effect on indigenous youth, and the inevitable offensive chants and signs from fans of opposing teams (e.g. “scalp the Redsk*ns”, etc.). Thanks to social media, decades of objections from Native Americans have finally reached the larger public and brought this issue to the fore. (See my blog post for some examples of how the word “redskins” was used in history.)

It is just the tip of the iceberg. This is not meant to detract attention from the important Redsk*ins mascot issue, but Native Americans are surrounded by such symbols, terms, and insulting policies. It’s a part of daily life to see them, hear about them, and be subject to them. Native Americans do in fact protest against most of these things, but in general show a remarkable degree of patience; there are just so many things to be offended about. Here are some of the more egregious offenses, which are frankly stunning when viewed from a different perspective. History cannot be changed, but all of these things can be.

1. Andrew Jackson on the $20 Billoffensive-20

As one of the strongest presidential advocates for ethnic cleansing and genocide of Native Americans, Jackson’s image on the ubiquitous $20 bill is a constant affront. There are movements among Native Americans to boycott its use.

It gets worse: Ulysses S. Grant, the man whom the US Supreme Court later concluded contrived a war to illegally take the Black Hills, is on the $50 bill.

Parallel: Imagine if Germany used Adolf Hitler on a commonly-used Deutschmark note (or if he appeared on a Euro bill).

offensive-20replacementWhat Can Be Done About It: He can easily be replaced with any number of other less-objectionable presidents, historical figures, or even famous Native Americans.  Here are ten potential Native Americans who can replace Jackson on the $20 bill (although some would consider a Native on US money more of an insult than an honor).

2. National Monuments: Little Bighorn vs Sand Creek and Wounded Kneeoffensive-littlebighorn

There are many historic white vs Indian battlefield sites in the US, but only a few were actually large battles where casualties numbered in the hundreds. Most of these were massacres of one side or the other. Three of the most notorious are Custer’s Last Stand (also known as the Battle of the Greasy Grass or the Battle of Little Bighorn), the Sand Creek Massacre, and the Wounded Knee Massacre. In all three, US federal or state military forces attacked encampments of Indian families. In the first, the US forces were overwhelmed and slaughtered by the Indians. In the latter two, the encampments were primarily unarmed women and children who were slaughtered by US forces. The site of Custer’s Last Stand is now enshrined as Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument, offensive-woundedkneecomplete with a large visitor center, several memorials, a national cemetery, walking trails, and a 4 ½ mile auto tour. In contrast, the Sand Creek massacre site is merely a National Historic Site marked by a roadside plaque and a small bookstore. It was only discovered in 1999 and most of the site remains in private hands. The Wounded Knee massacre site, arguably ground zero for Native American struggles past and present, is merely a National Historic Landmark. It lies down a rough road and has a makeshift memorial protected by a chain-link fence. It is largely held by a white landowner who will only sell it back to the Sioux at a grotesquely inflated price. A small private museum was burned in the 1973 uprising.

Parallel: Imagine Auschwitz as a used car lot with nothing to remember it but a small plaque along the highway.

What Can Be Done About It: Sand Creek and Wounded Knee should be elevated to National Monument status and funded accordingly. See this article regarding the latest about the Wounded Knee site.

3. Wounded Knee Battle Streamer and Medals of Honor

offensive-PineRidgebattlestreamer2The Wounded Knee Massacre involved the slaughter of several hundred Sioux old men, women, and children on an Indian “reservation” by the US Army’s 7th Calvary. It occurred almost a generation after Custer’s Last Stand and was arguably revenge for that event by the same unit of the military. The victims were part of the Ghost Dance movement to revive Indian pride and were not engaged in any violent actions whatsoever. Despite extensive investigations afterward, the Army awarded twenty of the soldiers Medals of Honor, including some who were involved in chasing down and killing women and children. To this day, the US Army flies a battle streamer honoring the engagement. It reads, “Pine Ridge 1890-1891”.  offensive-PineRidgebattlestreamer

Parallel: Imagine if the Ohio National Guard had a banner commemorating the Kent State Massacre and that several of their members received Medals of Honor for their service.

What Can Be Done About It: The US Army can eliminate their Pine Ridge battle streamer and the Medals of Honor can be rescinded. See this article for a recent editorial about the latter.

4. Tribe Names

This could be a very long list. A few examples: The Navajo call themselves the Diné, which means “the people”. The word “Navajo” is derived from a Pueblo word meaning “farms in the valley”. The Nez Perce call themselves the Niimíipu, which means “the people”. The word “Nez Perce” is French, meaning “pierced nose”. The Comanche call themselves Nermernuh, which means “the people”. The word “Comanche” is derived, via the Spanish, from a Ute word meaning “the enemy”. Yet these incorrect names persisted for so long that they have become codified in treaties and in law. Only recently have tribes begun to reassert their indigenous titles. And then there is of course the word “Indians”. This term is actually offensive in Canada, where indigenous peoples call themselves First Nations, but it is widely self-applied in the Lower 48.

Parallel: Imagine that Mexicans were officially called “Wetbacks” on US Census forms.

What Can Be Done About It: Many tribes are returning to their original names. The US Government and Bureau of Indian Affairs could follow suit and use the correct names as well.

5. Certificate Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB)

offensive-CDIBTo this day, every Native American in the US that is an official member of a federally-recognized tribe receives a little card from the Bureau of Indian Affairs, like a driver’s license, that is called a Certificate Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB). It has your name, your tribe, and what fraction of Indian “blood” you have (e.g. ½, ¼, etc.). It is derived directly from racist laws of the past that granted greater rights to people that were less Indian. It serves no legal purpose—each tribe sets its own enrollment standard and is free to ignore what it says on a CDIB card. (Yet most tribes still use the BIA’s 1934 recommendation to use blood quantum in defining membership. See this article for a discussion of the complicated issues that creates.)   The cards are often inaccurate, ignoring ancestry from multiple tribes, non-recognized tribes, and terminated tribes, failing to calculate ancestry from multiple family lines, and failing to have accurate information in the first place. Most importantly, they ignore the role of family and culture in ethnic self-identification. Finally, they are insulting. For no other ethnic group does the US government track degree of ancestry. And the “blood” terminology is for horse and dog breeds, not people.

Parallel: Imagine that, in the wake of 911, all Arab-Americans receive a card from the US government describing their “degree of Arab blood”.

What Can Be Done About It: BIA already lets the tribes tell them who their members are. They should forget about CDIB.

6. Mt. Rushmore  mtrushmore

First, Native Americans in general prefer to avoid actions that leave marks or scars on the landscape, especially on permanent objects like rock. For example, you will not find railings or fence posts driven into the rocky ledges above the cliffs of Canyon de Chelly National Monument at Navajo Nation, despite the fact that thousands of tourists walk near the edge of the 700 foot drop. Second, Paha Sapa, or the Black Hills, are the primary sacred site for the Sioux, given to them in the Treaty of 1868 and then stolen from them during a contrived war less than ten years later. (See my blog post on this here.)  To this day, they seek their rightful return. The carving of them into the enormous faces of four US presidents is one of the world’s most egregious examples of adding insult to injury. The insult is greater when one delves into these presidents’ policies and statements regarding Native Americans.

Parallel: Imagine Jews, Christians, and Muslims building holy sites on top of each other’s holy sites. (Actually, this parallel is not imaginary.)

What Can Be Done About It: Give it back to the Sioux and let them decide what to do with it.

7. Concentration Camps as “Reservations”offensive-bosqueredondo

In the 1800s, “reservation” was a politically nuanced term to appease Eastern liberals while satisfying Western pioneers. It almost implies a special reserve where Indians could be safe, protected, and free to live their lives as they please. Nothing, of course, was further from the truth. They were typically stripped of hunting weapons, bereft of food sources, and dependent on meager (and rotten) government rations. Mortality rates were astonishing. Their kids were taken from them and forbidden to speak their own language. If caught off-reservation, Indians could be killed. Today the term “reservation” is more associated with nice restaurants. The term white-washes history; these were in fact concentration camps. Located in some of the worst remote locations, they have evolved today into economically impoverished former concentration camps.

offensive-manzanarParallel: Imagine if today’s school children read about the Auschwitz Reservation, the Dachau Reservation, and the Manzanar Reservation.

What Can Be Done About It: Note that the US government called them “reservations”, but call them concentration camps.

8. Plundered Possessions offensive-hopimasks

Native possessions, often stolen from pilfered grave sites or directly from the battlefield, reside in museums and private collections all over the world. They are bought, sold, and traded in auctions and on-line. They include children’s moccasins from the Wounded Knee battlefield and a young boy’s shirt with bullet holes and blood stains. And lots of skulls and bones. There’s a law requiring the government to return these items, but the process has been slow. There’s no law when these items fall into private hands.

Parallel: A modern parallel is the Jewish books, paintings, and religious items plundered by the Nazis. They are now the subject of extensive recovery efforts. Reputable museums avoid such Jewish items while still displaying Native American possessions.

What Can Be Done About It: Call the cops; these are stolen goods.

9. Columbus Day  black legend

“Let us in the name of the Holy Trinity go on sending all the slaves that can be sold.” – Christopher Columbus. He was not even an American nor a patriot. He was an Italian working as a mercenary for Spain. He never set foot on US soil nor even saw it. And he clearly was at the forefront of the massive Spanish genocide of Native American peoples that occurred after 1492. Interestingly, Columbus Day has only been a federal holiday since 1937.

Parallel: Imagine a national holiday for Adolf Hitler—in Belgium.

What Can Be Done About It: Follow the examples of Seattle, Denver, Berkeley, Minneapolis, and South Dakota, call it Indigenous Peoples’ Day. Brazil and the Philippines also have holidays honoring indigenous peoples.

10. Place Names of Honor—Andover, De Soto, etc.offensive-Amherst

This list can go on forever, so here are just two examples. General Jeffrey Amherst was involved in the only documented case of deliberately sending smallpox-infected blankets to the Indians (“Could it not be contrived to send the small-pox among these disaffected tribes of Indians?”), yet he is remembered by several towns and a prestigious college. Hernando de Soto and his army of several hundred Spanish men cut a swath of terror, rape, slavery, torture, and murder thru ten states. His own biographer was horrified by his actions, writing, “Oh, wicked men! Oh, devilish greed!” Yet De Soto is honored today by counties, towns, parks, and schools.offensive-desotosign

Parallel: Imagine Ghengis Khan Elementary School in some of the lands he terrorized or Osama bin Laden County Park in Manhattan.

What Can Be Done About It: Easy fix; change the names.

11. Pocahontas’s Painting in the Capitol Rotunda

Pocahontas5Much about Pocahontas has been fictionalized, but a few facts are agreed to by all: She was kidnapped by the English and she “converted” to Christianity and was married to John Rolfe while in captivity. To this day, a painting of her baptism, twelve feet tall by seventeen feet wide, adorns the Capitol Rotunda.  The painted figures are life sized.  The artist is not shy about his purpose:  “She stands foremost in the train of those wandering children of the forest who have at different times—few, indeed, and far between—been snatched from the fangs of a barbarous idolatry, to become lambs in the fold of the Divine Shepherd. She therefore appeals to our religious as well as our patriotic sympathies and is equally associated with the rise and progress of the Christian Church as with the political destinies of the United States.”

Actually, this is not the only giant painting in the Capitol Rotunda depicting Native Americans; there are two others.  Both them show naked Native women about to be raped.

Parallel: Imagine ISIS or Boko Haram kidnapping Christian girls, declaring they have converted and married, and decorating their capitol with glorious portraits of their conversions.

What Can Be Done About It: Replace the painting with a true story, and with one with greater relevance to the founding of the United States. Pocahontas was kidnapped in 1615, even before the Pilgrims arrived.

12. The Black Hills pahasapa

Yes, back to the Black Hills, illegally stolen from the Sioux in a contrived war, so said the US Supreme Court in 1980. The Court awarded the Sioux a cash settlement, which sits today in a government account collecting interest. Estimated today to be worth over $1 billion, the Sioux won’t touch it because they want the land, not the money. Their mantra is “The Black Hills are not for sale.” The magnitude of the Sioux’s principled stand is not trivial. If the money were to be divided among them today, each household would receive over $50,000. This would be more than double median family income. If the money were invested, the interest earned each year would exceed current tribal government budgets. For a people with an 80% unemployment rate, where more than half live below the poverty line, where many households have no electricity, running water, sewage, or heat (other than wood stoves), this amount is not trivial.

Parallel: Imagine the county takes your family farm in a shady eminent domain case, then loses to you in court and reimburses you a token amount but will not return the land. Meanwhile, they aren’t really doing much with your land.

What Can Be Done About It: The US Government can resolve the court case by returning the Black Hills to the Sioux. It can be done, at least mostly, because most of the Black Hills are federally owned in the form of national forests and parks. The $1 billion can be used to pay off lumber companies, buy back mining rights, buy back grazing rights, decommission roads, and restore the habitat. See this page for a similar call from the environmental community.

 

Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

On this date… November 6, 1755… Pennsylvania

On this date in 1755, the Delaware leader Shingas paused at the mouth of Loyalhanna Creek during his raids on English homesteads and addressed his prisoners:

“I do not want to carry on the war against the English and am now willing again to make peace with them and restore all their captives and everything else we have from them, provided the English comply with the following proposals:loyalhanna

1. The English should send five men among us who should live well at our expense, but will work for us without any other pay other than support for their families. The business of the men is to be employed in: 1) making powder; 2) smelting lead from the ore, and we will not only find them lead mines but mines of every other metal that is necessary; 3) weaving of blankets; 4) making and mending guns for us; and 5) making iron.

2. The English should come and settle among us with their families and promote spinning for shirts and in general should bring all kinds of trade among us that we might be supplied with what we want near home, and that we and the English should live together in love and friendship and become one people (but we do not insist nor desire that the English should be obliged to intermarry with us).

On these terms we would be glad to be at peace with the English.”

The English prisoners were to put this proposal in writing, but alas, no one had pen, ink, or paper.

How did Shingas come to have English prisoners? Months earlier he met with General Edward Braddock at Fort Cumberland, where the British were preparing for war against the French. They were fighting over the Ohio River Valley.

Shingas asked Braddock the primary question in the minds of the Delaware, Shawnees, Mingos, and the Iroquois Confederacy, “What do you intend to do with the land if you can drive the French and their Indians away?”

Braddock replied, “The English shall inhabit and inherit the land.”

Shingas inquired further, “Will the Indians that are friends to the English be permitted to live and trade among the English and have hunting grounds sufficient to support themselves and their families, as they have nowhere to flee but into the hands of the French?”

Braddock: “No savage shall inherit the land.”

Shingas then withdrew his support for the expedition, telling Braddock, “If we might not have liberty to live on the land we will not fight for it.”

Braddock was unconcerned, saying, “We do not need your help and have no doubt of driving the French and their Indians away.”

Shingas did decide to fight for his land—against the British. With Shawnee, Mingo, and French support, he rolled back the American frontier practically to Philadelphia. In pioneer homesteads from the Potomac River to Berks County, houses and barns were burnt. Cattle, hogs, and horses were slaughtered in the fields. Hundreds of men, women, and children were taken captive and distributed to Indians all the way to Fort Duquense (Pittsburgh). Within a year, the French commander at the fort counted five-hundred Pennsylvania pioneer scalps brought in the by the Indian raiders.

But these weren’t the only scalps being sought. Pennsylvania was offering a reward for them as well. Shingas, who only a few months earlier was asking the British how he could assist them, was now known as Shingas the Terrible. In Philadelphia, his scalp was worth seven-hundred dollars.

Posted in On this date... | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

On this date… November 3, 1875… Washington, D.C.

On this date in 1875, President Ulysses Grant contrived a war to steal the Black Hills. grant-50George Bush II contrived a war. He said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, but what they really had was oil. The Lakota, or Sioux, had gold and Grant needed to find a way to get it. The gold was in Paha Sapa, the Black Hills, the center of the world for the Sioux. The sacred mountains had already been given to the Sioux in the Treaty of 1868, when the US was defeated by Red Cloud

pahasapaPresident Grant was buffeted by the cries of pioneers, settlers, miners, and the military on one side, and by treaty obligations, laws, his own peace policy, and missionaries and citizens concerned about Indians’ rights on the other.

He had sent another expedition to the Black Hills to confirm the reports of gold. It was Custer. He confirmed the gold and also discovered hundreds of trespassing white gold-seekers. custer

He had sent General George Crook to evict the miners, but not before assembling 169 of them at a place they called Custer Creek to write down their mining claims for such time in the future “when the country shall have been opened.” General Crook then let them scatter back into the hills, making little attempt to stop them. It was clear who the government was working for. Remarkably, the Sioux showed restraint, and not a single act of violence against the miners was reported.

He had met with Spotted Tail, Red Cloud, and Lone Horn in Washington, suggesting they relocate to Oklahoma. Spotted Tail had replied: “You speak of another country, but it is not my country; it does not concern me, and I want nothing to do with it. I was not born there. If it is such a good country, you ought to send the white men now in our country there and let us alone.”

He had convened a council on the White River to negotiate cessation of the Black Hills. That did not go well for him. The Sioux, Cheyenne, and Arapaho arrived with a show of force, 20,000 strong. Their lodges (tepees) covered the plain. Painted and dressed for battle, they were in no mood for discussing real estate. Horsemen charged in formation, firing guns in the air. Crazy Horse refused to even attend, but his envoy danced his horse between the seats of the two sides, proclaiming, “I will kill the first chief who speaks for selling the Black Hills.” The US representatives were lucky to walk away alive.

On this date, November 3, 1875, President Grant convened another council, this one at the White House. The only attendees were his yes-men, his sympathetic cabinet members and military generals: Secretary of State Zachariah Chandler, Assistant Secretary of the Interior Benjamin Cowen, Indian Commissioner E.P. Smith, Secretary of War William Belknap, General Philip Sheridan, and General George Crook. With hearts of gold, they contrived a war that would justify the abrogation of the treaty and the taking of the Black Hills.

sitting bullTheir target would be the Sioux living at large on the unceded lands, theirs by treaty. Their villain would be Sitting Bull. Like the Tonkin Gulf Resolution that led to Vietnam or Colin Powell’s speech to the UN to justify the invasion of Iraq, Grant’s men would leak a false military report to the press. Sitting Bull, in full compliance with the treaty, was described in terms that in later years would be associated with Mosaddegh, Arbenz, Lumumba, Castro, Ydigoras, Bosch, Sukarno, Papandreau, Nkrumah, Guevara, Allende, Manley, Roldos, Torrijos, Aristide, Chavez, and Morales. Sitting Bull was said to be “hostile, lofty, independent, contemptuous, defiant, boastful, scornful, savage, untamable, uncivilized, and disrespectful of white authority.”

Grant’s military plan was to take full advantage of the fact that the Sioux were burdened by women and children. “One thousand men under the command of an experienced officer, sent into their country in the winter, when the Indians are nearly always in camp, and at which season of the year they are the most helpless, would be amply sufficient for their capture or punishment… and to whip them into subjection.”

By February 1, 1876, the Sioux were “turned over to the War Department for such action on the part of the army as deemed proper under the circumstances.”blackhillsnotforsale

This led directly to Custer’s Last Stand, the internment of the Sioux in concentration camps, the assassination of Crazy Horse while in custody, the murder of Sitting Bull while in custody, the revenge massacre of women and children at Wounded Knee, the rape of the Black Hills by Homestake Mine, the creation of the Hearst family fortune, the sacrilege of Mt. Rushmore, the Sioux’s legal victory in the US Supreme Court in 1980 that the war was illegal and the Black Hills are rightfully theirs, and their rejection of monetary compensation (now worth over $1 billion) for Paha Sapa—because the Black Hills are not for sale and they never were.

Posted in On this date... | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Evo, first indigenous leader in 500 years, poised to win third term in Bolivia

evo2“Este presidente es mi presidente.”  This president is my president.  Such were the words on a poster I saw in a tiny bedroom in a small village at 13,000 feet in the Altiplano, Bolivia, several years ago.  It’s a big deal for them.  As recently as 1952, when a Quaker group from the US bought a parcel of land to open a school, the land came with serfs– indigenous slaves tied to the property.  Since then, Bolivia has seen a series of right-wing leaders who sold their natural resources to Western companies with little return for the people.

evo4 All that changed in 2006, when they elected a poor coca farmer named Evo Morales.  He has marshaled the royalties from natural gas and other resource revenues for the benefit of the poor.  Electricity, water, paved roads, and (of course) artificial turf soccer fields are appearing throughout the nation.  Thanks to a small stipend to families (called the “juancito”), children are going to school.

And knowledge of the indigenous languages of Aymara and Quechua are now required for government employees, leading to a surge in language classes.  evo1The wiphala, the indigenous flag, has been given official status, so that now Bolivia has two national flags.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

For the indigenous majority in Bolivia (yes, majority), it is the fulfillment of the prophecy of Tupac Katari, an indigenous leader killed (drawn and quartered) in the 18th century:  “I will return and it will be in the millions.”   I was told that life goes in 500-year cycles, and now is their time; the sleeping Inca of Machu Pichu is waking up.

CNN doesn’t seem to be covering his re-election story (and usually finds something negative to highlight), but here is the news from Al-Jazeera’s Latin office, which opens with a positive spin regarding dramatic poverty reduction.  Viva Evo!

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Posted in news | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

On this date… October 7, 1763… London

proclineOn this date in 1763, the King drew a line across America. It ran along the crest of the Appalachians from Vermont to Georgia. West of that line was the Indian Reserve. The American colonists were not allowed to cross the mountains, to buy land from the Indians, nor to trade with the Indians without the approval of the Crown.

“And whereas great Frauds and Abuses have been committed in the Purchasing Lands of the Indians, to the great Prejudice of our Interests, and to the great Dissatisfaction of the said Indians; In order therefore to prevent such Irregularities for the Future, and to the End that the Indians may be convinced of Our Justice and determined Resolution to remove all reasonable Cause of Discontent, We do, with the Advice of Our Privy Council, strictly enjoyn and require, that no private Person do presume to make any Purchase from the said Indians…

every Person, who may incline to trade with the said Indians, do take out a Licence for carrying on such Trade, from the Governor…”manifestdestiny

But the primary story of conflict in America was not between the Native peoples and political Powers in Europe or along the East Coast. It was between Natives and trespassing unruly pioneers and settlers. And when these ruffians violated treaties with the Natives, the Powers that governed them invariably looked the other way.

This Proclamation Line of 1763 was an artifact of Britain’s victory over the French. But it was short-lived. When the American revolutionaries defeated the British, the line (however ignored) disappeared altogether.

Posted in On this date... | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Indians on Mars: Interpreting Sherman Alexi’s Talk at Whitman College

On October 1, renowned Spokane author Sherman Alexie was invited to speak at Whitman College in Walla Walla, Washington, not far from his boyhood home on the rez. The college, named in honor of Marcus Whitman, a missionary famously killed by Indians, had recently selected Alexie’s book Reservation Blues for its summer reading program.  But if they expected an intellectual discourse about the novel or about life on the rez or about the ironies of a Spokane native addressing the “Missionaries” (yes, that is their mascot), they were left disappointed.   Instead, Alexie embarked on a ninety-minute free-wheeling stand-up comedy routine that left the crowd wondering whether he was a jaded performer toying with the crowd (and sometimes making fun of them) or a clever poet/writer who had no interest in predictable monologues.

Let’s assume the latter, as Alexie has said that he does stand-up comedy so the aIMG_1089udience can get to know him.  Why regurgitate a book to them that they have already read?

Woven between his jokes and the audience’s constant laughter was Alexie’s favorite theme:  art is a social weapon.  Art exposes that which is off, pretentious, oppressive, unequal, or ostentatious.  Art will offend those that have a vested interest in the status quo.  He views himself as an artist and nothing is too sacred for his barbs.

One of his common targets is white liberals who idolize Native Americans as noble, pure, and one with nature– a stereotype that has swirled around this continent since the first large scale displacement of Native communities.  Call it conqueror’s guilt.  He positively skewered the white hippy fetish for “spirit animals” (while bemoaning that his rejection of such beliefs had just been called into question by a squirrel that had crawled up his pant leg earlier in the day).

By example, Alexie presents himself more as a cosmopolitan man living in Seattle (which he is) than a stoic Indian crying a solitary tear over a polluted earth (referring to a famous old advertisement).  A few years ago the 1491’s (a Native performing group) attempted to break down stereotypes of Native Americans by releasing a YouTube video of smiling Indians (dedicated to Edward Curtis, the photographer known for publishing only the serious expressions).  Alexie goes one step further by joking about electronic media, double chins, and bad art in hotel rooms.

His own ethnic group was not spared either.  He imitated a tribal elder who solemnly announced that he was seeking guidance from the four directions.  “Dude,” Alexie said, “we are talking about a casino parking garage.”  But then Alexie caught himself and looked at the audience, “I just called a council member ‘dude’.  That,” he proclaimed, “is art.”

But Alexie’s ethnic background is not just any ethnic group.  His was the one that used to live here, that was displaced, and that is now, in his presenceIMG_1162, reclaiming the stage.

The history of the area is present for anyone who looks.  The Columbia River, once filled with salmon, is now a stair step of lakes and hydroelectric dams.  (Fifty percent of the nation’s salmon were wiped out by one dam, the Grand Coulee.  The other dams did a fair job on the rest.)  At the west end of the Walla Walla valley lie the old French farms (like Touchet) where Peopeomoxmox was mutilated under a flag of truce.  He now stands in bronze, ears and hands and feet intact, in downtown Walla Walla.  It only became acceptable to honor him with the statue within the last few decades.  And of course, there is the Whitman Mission, the source of so much local lore IMG_1069and remembrance. The Marcus Whitman Hotel and Conference Center, the nicest place in town and quite possibly where Alexie was housed, is across the street from Peopeomoxmox’s statue.  Down the highway, the Umatilla now have an army depot named after them.  Ironies abound.  The CayusIMG_1076e, whose members were accused of the Whitman murders and who consequently suffered ethnic cleansing and confinement on a reservation (as did all the tribes in the area), are not prominently memorialized.

Alexie made a few passing references to Native history.  He wondered how many Indian killers had stayed in his old hotel rooms.  He referred to Andrew Jackson as a genocidal maniac (which drew a surprising amount of applause from the liberal audience).  And he bemoaned the environmental destruction of the Columbia River – they had to “fuck it all up” because it was all sacred and beautiful.

But most of the ironies of past and present were left unsaid, summed up by thIMG_1081e short quip, “Notice I haven’t even mentioned the Whitmans.”  Like any good writer, Alexie illustrated the irony taking place with his grand finale.

He reclaimed the Whitmans’ stage with Native song and dance.  He had met with local tribal members earlier in the day, many of whom were in attendance.  One young Umatilla woman had told him of her ambition to become an astronaut.  The question Alexie posed to us was, “what would the first indigenous woman astronaIMG_1163ut say if she was the first person to set foot on Mars?”

He instantly rejected Neil Armstrong’s giant leap language and quickly landed on something more Native.  She would address all the potential Martian life forms past and present and ask permission to walk upon their planet.

It was hard to know if he was serious or poking fun at another Indian stereotype.  Regardless, he then proceeded to orchestrate the Mars landing on stage. He called up three Umatilla drummers (addressing the “lead singer” in homage to a running joke in Reservation Blues) as well as the young astronaut-to-be.  The audience was then treated to the spectacle of the Umatillas performing the Grand Entry (a traditional opening to Indian pow-wows) past a podium emblazoned with the name of Whitman.  It wasn’t Mars, but given the history of the area, it may as well have been.

What made this possible?  What is it that has enabled a Spokane rez boy to address the white elite at Whitman College?  And what allowed the Umatilla to march and drum across a stage memorializing Marcus Whitman and to be applauded for it?  It is art and stories and laughter, Alexie has said, that tears down such walls and brings people together.

Posted in my own thoughts | Tagged | 1 Comment

On this date… September 8, 1858… Washington

On this date in 1858, the US Army under Colonel George Wright began executing nine-hundred horses of the Yakama, Palus, and Spokane tribes.  Their bones can still be found today along the Spokane River near Liberty Lake.      

“It was a cruel sight to see so many Spokanehorses1noble beasts shot down. They were all sleek, glossy, and fat, and as I love a horse, I fancied I saw in their beautiful faces an appeal for mercy. Towards the last the soldiers appeared to exult in their bloody task; and such is the ferocious character of men.”  – US Army soldier

“As she stepped out of her front door, Big Mom heard the first gunshot, which reverberated in her DNA.  She pulled her dress up around her waist and ran for the clearing, heard a gunshot with each of her footfalls.  All she heard were the gunshots, singular at first, and then in rapid bursts that she could not count. 

Big Mom ran to the rise above the clearing where the horses gathered.  There, she saw the future and the past, the white soldiers in blue uniforms with black rifles and pistols.  She saw the Indian horses shot and fallen like tattered sheets.  Big Mom stood on the rise and watched the horses fall, until only one remained. Spokanehorses2

Big Mom watched the Indian colt circled by soldiers.  The colt darted from side to side, looked for escape.  One soldier, an officer, stepped down from his pony, walked over to the colt, gently touched its face, and whispered in its ear.  The colt shivered as the officer put his pistol between its eyes and pulled the trigger.  That colt fell to the grass of the clearing, to the sidewalk outside a reservation tavern, to the cold, hard coroner’s table in a Veterans Hospital.” – Sherman Alexie, Reservation Blues

Posted in On this date... | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Pot Farms and Reservations

Last week the Tule River Reservation outside of Porterville, California combined with state and federal agencies to conduct a massive raid on four large pot farms on their reservation.  The “pot grows”, as they are known in California, were causing the usual array of environmental problems.  According to a local paper, “the growers were poaching wildlife, destroying habitat, and polluting land and water.”  More seriously, they were using a network of water diversion dams and ten miles of irrigation pipes to fill seven illegal reservoirs, siphoning off up to 100,000 gallons of water a day to feed their thirsty crop.  Even without a drought, they were threatening to take 80% of the reservation’s water.  (See a 2011 article from Indian Country Today Media Network on their water project.)  A similar raid just took place on the Yurok Reservation

pot3

Discussions of pot legalization often ignore the environmental devastation currently being wrecked upon California’s streams by pot farms.  Illegal, unregulated, and scattered across hundreds of watersheds, the pot farms divert precious headwater streams while using copious amounts of fertilizer.  This deprives important salmon streams of water, raises water temperature, and creates toxic algae blooms that kill fish and even dogs.  Endangered coho salmon are most at risk.  This paper demonstrates that pot farms are diverting 30% to 100% of water from headwater streams.  Many pot farms also use enormous amounts of rat poison which works up the food chain, impacting other wildlife such as the endangered fisher (a large weasel).

Under Proposition 215 in 1996, California allows pot for medical purposes, up to six plants per person.  Virtually all of the pot farms in the state are called “215 grows”.  They post the names, on laminated sheets of paper tacked to a tree or fence post, of supposed prescription holders, which in total may number more than the population of the state.  Greenhouses with grow lights account for 8% of all residential electricity use in the state.  It comes as no surprise that much of California’s crop is exported across the nation.  The growth of pot farms in California has been tremendous in recent years, as can be readily seen in this Google Earth kmz file, toggling back and forward thru the years.  Most are located on hills above the fog belt with access to small streams for water.

pot1

While most of these farms are too small to interest federal prosecution, the fact that marijuana is federally illegal creates a number of complicating issues.  First, to avoid seizure of their finances, all transactions are in cash, making pot farms attractive to organized crime ranging from Mexican drug cartels to Southeast Asian rebel groups.  Large “garden supply centers” in Eureka, California advertise portable greenhouses, irrigation tubing, and urea fertilizer.  Some sell cash counters.  All that cash requires protection.  This, in turn, makes walking in the forest a dangerous proposition.  Hikers are often shot at.  Second, efforts by state and local agencies to manage, regulate, and inspect pot farms are quashed by federal authorities who threaten them with participating in a federally illegal activity.  At the same time, the model pot farmers who are in compliance with local regulations become the first ones targeted by the feds.

With pot now legal in Colorado and Washington, the demand keeps growing.  It remains to be seen if federal legalization would result in improved management.  Conceivably it would bring pot out of the hills and into larger commercial production where water and pesticide use can be effectively regulated by state and local agencies without fear of federal prosecution.  One thing for sure, the current mix of a state-legal/federally-illegal status has led to increased demand, confusion among regulators, and chaos in the hills.

Several California tribes find themselves in the center of this mess.  Like the Tule River Tribe, the Hoopa Valley Tribe is taking a strong stand against pot farms.  Located in the center of the “Emerald Triangle”, the reservation can practically be seen from outer space based on the absence of pot farms within its boundaries.  They are seeking to protect their land, water, and salmon from the destructive impacts of rampant pot farming.  Nevertheless, thepot4y have had conflicts with local trespassers.  Using an alternative strategy, the tribes of the Round Valley Indian Reservation (the Yuki, Pit River, Nomlacki, Concow, Pomo, and Wailacki) have legalized pot farms specifically so that they can manage where it is grown.  A few years ago, attorney Gabe Galanda of the Round Valley Reservation discussed the pros and cons of marijuana legalization on Indian Reservations.

Until there are cohesive federal and state policies, tribes in pot country can expect to find their lands (and water) under assault, if not by the feds than by unscrupulous pot farming practices.

pot2

Posted in news | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

On this date… August 27, 1689… New Mexico

On this date in 1689, Zia Pueblo was laid waste by the Spanish.zia1

The Zia symbol graces the flag of New Mexico, the Land of Enchantment.  School children pledge, “I salute the flag of the State of New Mexico and the Zia symbol of perfect friendship among united cultures.”

zia3

But on August 27, 1689, six-hundred men of Zia lay slain, at least seventy enslaved, while the survivors, men, women, elders, and children, sat atop Cerro Colorado, watching their pueblo burn.  From this promontory they watched the Spanish soldiers and waited for a chance to reclaim the bodies of their relatives.

zia2

 

 

The people of Zia stayed atop their natural citadel for several years.

 

Posted in On this date... | 1 Comment

“We Shall Remain”

This deserves a few more hits.  Enjoy!  

 “We Shall Remain” by The StyleHorse Collective 

Also, see their Facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/TheStyleHorseCollective

StyleHorse

 

Posted in news | Tagged , | Leave a comment