Federal Court Victory for Oglala and Rosebud Sioux Children

The Geneva Convention defines genocide as “…any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

Siouxchild(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”

It’s that last one that has been a chronic issue in the US for decades.  Up to a third of Native children were removed from their homes in some areas in recent years.  Now comes a rare victory in South Dakota:

Federal Judge Says South Dakota Officials Violated Native American Families’ Rights

Unknown's avatar

About Stephen Carr Hampton

Stephen Carr Hampton is an enrolled citizen of Cherokee Nation, an avid birder since age 7, and a former resource economist for the California Department of Fish & Game, where he worked as a tribal liaison and conducted natural resource damage assessments and oversaw environmental restoration projects after oil spills. He writes most often about Native history and contemporary issues, birds, and climate change.
This entry was posted in news and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Federal Court Victory for Oglala and Rosebud Sioux Children

  1. Cheryl's avatar Cheryl says:

    Yes they did and this is GENOCIDE. Doesn’t matter culture or color of skin or religion or denomination it is still “GENOCIDE”. VIOLATIONS WERE DONE TO THE NATIVE AMERICAN CHILDREN AND THEIR FAMILIES. !!!!

Leave a reply to Cheryl Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.